No credible public evidence reviewed through September 23, 2026 establishes Tyra Banks and Greg Hayes as a romantic couple, spouses, relatives, or significant business partners. The recent pages that place their names together generally appear to mean Gregory J. Hayes, the former chief executive and executive chairman of RTX, but “Greg Hayes” is not a unique name and no authoritative source has explained why that particular executive became associated with Banks in search results.
The stronger public record points elsewhere. Recent established reporting identifies businessman Louis Bélanger-Martin as Banks’ longtime partner, while corporate records place Gregory J. Hayes in a separate world of aerospace leadership and board governance. There is also no significant shared project between Banks and Hayes documented in the authoritative sources reviewed.
The pairing is therefore better understood as an unexplained search association rather than an established relationship. Their individual careers, however, are well documented and help explain why each name carries public interest for very different reasons.
The Identity Problem Behind the Search
Before comparing biographies, it is important to establish which Greg Hayes is being discussed.
Recent comparison and explainer pages usually identify him as Gregory J. Hayes, the longtime United Technologies and RTX executive. That interpretation is plausible, but the search phrase alone does not prove it. Columbia Business School, for example, has profiled another Greg Hayes as a co-founder of the office-furniture company Branch.
No original interview, company announcement, event record, legal document, or established news report was found tying Banks specifically to Gregory J. Hayes. Nor was there reliable evidence of a major public collaboration between them.
That distinction matters because a cluster of pages repeating the same two names can create the appearance of a connection even when the underlying sources do not establish one. In this case, the safest description is precise: no credible public documentation reviewed establishes a romantic, family, or significant business relationship between Tyra Banks and Gregory J. Hayes.
That is not the same as claiming they have never met. Public records cannot prove every private interaction.
Tyra Banks’ Move From Modeling Into Media
Banks’ career first became nationally significant through fashion. One of her clearest documented milestones came with Sports Illustrated Swimsuit.

In 1996, Banks appeared on the magazine’s cover alongside Valeria Mazza, becoming the first Black woman to appear on a Sports Illustrated Swimsuit cover. The following year, she became the first Black woman to receive a solo cover.
Those two dates are sometimes compressed in shorter biographies, but the distinction matters. The 1996 appearance was a shared cover; 1997 was the solo milestone.
Banks later expanded well beyond runway and editorial modeling. In 2003, she created America’s Next Top Model, serving as host and executive producer. The original U.S. version ultimately ran for 24 cycles through 2018.
The show changed Banks’ public role. She was no longer simply the subject of fashion imagery; she was shaping a television format, producing entertainment, and building a brand around modeling expertise and personality. That shift became the central through-line of her later career.
Television, Teaching, and Business
Banks continued to work across television while adding business and educational projects.
Stanford Graduate School of Business announced in 2016 that she would serve as a lecturer and co-instructor for a course titled “Project You: Building and Extending Your Personal Brand.” Stanford’s own material also states that she had completed an executive-education program at Harvard Business School.
That should not be turned into a degree claim. The available evidence supports executive education, not an MBA from Harvard or Stanford.
In later years, Banks developed SMiZE & DREAM, a dessert business with a flagship location in Sydney. The venture became one of the clearest signs that her current work extends beyond television.
It also generated a small but instructive regulatory episode. In January 2026, ABC Australia reported that the New South Wales Food Authority had raised concerns over references to “ice cream” for a product that was not frozen. The business subsequently changed the product name from references to “Hot Ice Cream” to “Hot SMiZE Cream” and adjusted customer-facing wording.
The episode did not define the business, but it showed Banks operating in a very different commercial environment from her earlier modeling years: product development, retail, branding, and food-marketing rules.
Her television work also remained active. Freeform announced that Banks would serve as a recurring judge on Project Runway season 22, which premiered July 9, 2026.
As of September 2026, her public career therefore spans several distinct phases: fashion, reality television, production, teaching, consumer business, and a return to fashion television through Project Runway.
Her Publicly Reported Relationship With Louis Bélanger-Martin
The most relevant personal-life fact for understanding the Banks-Hayes search is that established reporting identifies someone else as Banks’ partner.
PEOPLE reported in January 2025 that Banks had been in a relationship with businessman Louis Bélanger-Martin since at least 2019. ESSENCE also referred to him as her boyfriend in a 2025 profile based around Banks’ life and work in Sydney.
By February 2026, PEOPLE reported that Banks was living in Australia with Bélanger-Martin and her son.
Those reports are much stronger evidence than websites that place Banks and Hayes together merely because their names have become associated online. They do not justify making broader claims about Banks’ private life beyond what was publicly reported, but they clearly undercut any suggestion that the Banks-Hayes keyword itself proves a romantic relationship.
The Continuing Weight of America’s Next Top Model
Even years after its original U.S. run ended, America’s Next Top Model remains central to how Banks is discussed publicly.
In June 2026, Banks filed a federal lawsuit against Netflix and others connected with Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model. The complaint alleged that the production had presented or edited material in ways Banks considered defamatory.
Those are allegations, not established findings.
The Associated Press reported on the filing, and later reporting documented efforts by defendants to dismiss the case. By September 22, 2026, reporting indicated that Banks had opposed that dismissal effort. No final judgment or definitive legal outcome was established in the material reviewed for this profile.
The lawsuit matters because it shows that Banks’ most famous television project continues to shape her current public life. It does not, however, create any connection to Gregory J. Hayes.
Gregory J. Hayes’ Career at United Technologies
The Gregory J. Hayes most often meant by recent search-result pages followed a career path almost entirely outside entertainment.
According to Becton, Dickinson and Company’s official biography, Hayes joined United Technologies Corporation, or UTC, in 1999 through the company’s merger with Sundstrand Corporation.
That date corrects a mistake repeated by some recent comparison sites, which say he joined UTC in 1989.
Hayes became UTC’s chief financial officer in 2008, then chief executive in 2014. He added the chairman’s role in 2016.
His background was financial rather than celebrity-facing. Phillips 66 and BD both state that he earned a bachelor’s degree in economics from Purdue University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Those credentials fit the corporate path documented in his official biographies: finance, operations, senior management, and eventually overall leadership of a large industrial company.
The Creation of Raytheon Technologies
The defining corporate event of Hayes’ tenure came in 2020.

He led the combination of UTC’s remaining aerospace businesses with Raytheon Company, creating Raytheon Technologies, later renamed RTX. The transaction reshaped UTC’s remaining businesses around aerospace and defense and put Hayes at the head of the combined company.
That move became the central event associated with his executive career. It also explains why many present-day biographies refer to him primarily through RTX rather than through the older United Technologies name.
Hayes continued as chief executive until May 2, 2024, when Christopher T. Calio succeeded him. Hayes then moved into the role of executive chairman.
The distinction is important because a number of 2026 pages still describe Hayes as RTX’s current CEO. That is outdated.
His Exit From RTX and Current Board Roles
RTX announced that Hayes would step down as executive chairman and leave the board effective April 30, 2025. He then remained as a special adviser to the CEO through January 2, 2026.

As of September 23, 2026, Hayes should therefore be described as a former RTX CEO and former executive chairman, not as the company’s current chief executive or chairman.
His current documented work has shifted toward corporate governance.
Phillips 66 appointed Hayes lead independent director effective May 13, 2026. In that role, he is part of the company’s board leadership rather than its operating management.
He also serves as a director of Becton, Dickinson and Company. BD announced his appointment in March 2025, and a May 2026 regulatory filing continued to identify him as a director.
NAF, an education-focused nonprofit organization, also identifies Hayes as its chairman. Its current materials refer to him as the former executive chairman of RTX, which is consistent with RTX’s own transition records.
These roles give a much more accurate picture of Greg Hayes’ current status than pages that continue to present him as actively running RTX.
Why the Two Names Keep Appearing Together
The origin of the Tyra Banks and Greg Hayes pairing remains uncertain.
By mid-to-late 2026, numerous websites were publishing pages comparing the two or asking whether they were connected. One of the earlier pages found in the research was an Age Fact comparison entry, but there is not enough authoritative evidence to say that it created the pairing.
Some later pages suggest that search engines, automated comparison content, or repeated publishing caused the association to grow. That is possible, but it remains a theory unless supported by original analytics, a documented first source, or information from the relevant platforms.
What can be established is that repetition alone has not produced better evidence. Several pages repeat similar claims or questions, yet none supplies a reliable source showing a relationship, marriage, family connection, or significant shared business project.
That is why the quantity of pages is less important than the quality of the underlying evidence.
Relationship, Marriage, and Professional Claims
The available record supports a limited set of conclusions.
There is no reputable reporting reviewed that identifies Tyra Banks and Gregory J. Hayes as a romantic couple. Recent established coverage instead identifies Louis Bélanger-Martin as Banks’ partner.
There is no credible documentation reviewed showing that Banks married Hayes.
There is also no major public professional collaboration documented between them. Banks’ work centers on fashion, television, production, teaching, and consumer products. Hayes’ documented career centers on finance, aerospace, corporate leadership, and board governance.
What should not be claimed is equally important. There is no basis for saying the two have “never met,” because that would require knowledge of private interactions that public records cannot provide.
Net Worth Claims Need More Caution
Recent comparison pages also publish precise or semi-precise net-worth figures for both Banks and Hayes. Those figures should not be treated as verified.
A person’s net worth requires evidence about assets, ownership interests, liabilities, and other financial obligations. Public executive compensation, stock transactions, company revenue, and estimated business values do not automatically produce a reliable personal-fortune calculation.
For Hayes in particular, available corporate records can document compensation structures and board roles without establishing a complete present-day net worth. The same problem applies to broad estimates attached to Banks.
A high-confidence profile should therefore leave those figures out rather than convert uncertain estimates into apparent facts.
Their Current Public Positions in 2026
By September 2026, Banks remained active in both entertainment and business. SMiZE & DREAM had become an important part of her work in Sydney, while her recurring role on Project Runway brought her back into a major fashion-television format. Her earlier work on America’s Next Top Model also remained newsworthy because of the ongoing Netflix litigation.
Hayes, meanwhile, had completed his transition out of RTX. His public work was concentrated in board and governance positions, including Phillips 66, BD, and NAF.
Those current roles reinforce what the evidence has shown throughout: the two public figures occupy different professional spheres, and the online pairing of their names is more clearly documented than any relationship between them.
Conclusion
The phrase Tyra Banks and Greg Hayes suggests a connection that the reliable public record does not establish. Recent pages generally appear to mean Gregory J. Hayes, the former UTC and RTX executive, but even that identification requires care because the name Greg Hayes belongs to more than one public person.
Banks’ documented career runs from landmark fashion work into television, production, teaching, and entrepreneurship, with current activity in Sydney and on Project Runway. Hayes’ career developed through corporate finance and aerospace leadership before moving into board service after his departure from RTX.
As of September 23, 2026, the clearest evidence supports treating them as separate public figures whose names have become associated online for reasons that remain unverified. No credible source reviewed establishes them as a couple, relatives, or significant business partners.